Remember all the mainstream media articles saying that unvaccinated Americans were more likely to be hospitalized or die? And remember the articles saying that the dumb, mask-ditching, jab-hesitant conservative/Republican rednecks were the dumbest of all? You were stupid if you didn’t wear a mask, and even more stupid for not following Fauci’s other restrictions. You were not a serious person because you didn’t take the pandemic seriously. You were directly responsible for increased transmissions, you caused more severe outcomes, and you killed Grandma, for God’s sake.
The mainstream media couldn’t wait to show us the great vaccine disparities between red and blue states, and they salivated at sharing the huge differences in death rates between conservative and liberal states. They shamed the unjabbed with sentences like this: “Despite concerted efforts to convince those most hesitant, 57 million eligible Americans over the age of five remain completely unvaccinated.” Even five year olds are at fault!
“Vaccine hesitancy in red states!” shouted CNN as they declared COVID-19 a political issue. Never mind that THEY (the mainstream media outlets) made it a political issue by correlating voting with COVID jabs, e.g. the 10 states with the highest vaccination rates all voted for Biden in 2020. Polls like this one from February 2022 couldn’t wait to let everyone know that a little over half (56% of Republicans) were vaccinated, but nearly all of Democrats (92%) were. Most of these stories were accompanied by the tombstone of some unfortunate Republican who was too dumb to get vaccinated, and therefore paid the ultimate price.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has long said she is leading the agency with science, but reminds people that “while the implication is that science is black and white …with an ever-evolving virus, and a two-year-long pandemic, the science…is oftentimes shades of gray.”
Is the CDC intentionally keeping things gray to pull the wool over our eyes? They can talk about death rates in red states, and use their media handlers to lead us to believe they are deaths from the virus, but are the deaths really from the jabs? Leaked CDC documents show that more deadly batches were directed towards red states.
One of the first reports about bad batches was in 2021 when European Union (EU) regulators found significant differences in quality among different jab batches. They couldn’t determine the cause of the poor quality, but noted that the Pfizer jab contents were prone to spoilage and that the batches were much lower standard than Pfizer had promised. Interestingly, we may have never known about the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulator concerns, except that the details from the senior official’s November 23 email were leaked following a cyberattack.
Bad batches are not supposed to occur, ever. Why? Because the FDA supposedly has a rigorous pharmacovigilance process in place, yet their own COVID-19 specific webpage hasn’t been updated since 2021. In short, bad batches should never occur, and if they do, the product should be immediately removed from the public – either permanently or until the issue is fixed. The pharmacovigilance process ensures a smooth and safe transition between pre-market and post-market. It is the responsibility of Pfizer (and Moderna and all other manufacturers) to have it in place, and the FDA’s responsibility to monitor it in the US.
Pfizer’s own website assures us that the company’s “pharmacovigilance organization ensures the safe and appropriate use of the products in our portfolio through the collection, analysis and reporting of safety events. As our portfolio grows and technology evolves, the volume of case reports is increasing.” Funny how they never attribute the rising cases to their own batch issues, isn’t it?
Numerous articles like this one from the New York Times on how Pfizer makes their products were supposed to reassure the public that everything was under control. Was the media in on the ruse as well? We all know the answer.
“During clinical trials, patient exposure is limited and closely monitored, and there are very specific criteria for patients who are eligible to take part in the study. However, once the product is on the market and more widely available, patient exposure is much more widespread and patients may experience adverse reactions (ARs) or adverse drug experiences (ADEs) that have not been observed previously in a clinical trial setting.”
Actually, pharmacovigilance is (and should be) a global concern, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). They define pharmacovigilance as “the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problem.” WHO even recently expanded pharmacovigilance to include adverse events! WHO states emphatically that new drugs must have good quality, effectiveness and safety for its intended purpose. In my estimation, batch variability of any kind negates good quality, and the jab has been shown to be neither safe nor effective.
Just to add insult to injury, here is NIH NIAID’s take on pharmacovigilance. You know NIAID, right? It’s the agency Fauci ran for decades. The point is that these agencies can have the most glorious web pages in the world, but if they don’t actually do the things they purport to do, the pages are worthless.
Pharmacovigilance Did Not Happen
All of these agencies and companies tell us that pharmacovigilance is of the utmost concern. NONE OF THIS HAPPENED. There was no close monitoring of clinical trials. In fact, Pfizer hid its data with help from these agencies. Is the FDA intentionally keeping these jabs in the gray area? After all, they’re not really post-market, but are still emergency use, so is that a loophole to not care whether there is variability among batches?
Why does no one seem to care? Why is this not being enforced? Is it sheer incompetence, or something far more sinister?
Staying in the gray area would make it possible to hide the variability in the batches. The vials are all different – this has been shown. Vials are not at the right temperature, there is a wide variety of ingredient changes from batch to batch and many batches show that mRNA is not intact. Steve Kirsch had a colleague do analysis on four vials; not only did they not find mRNA, they found many other disturbing things.
Many independent investigations like Steve’s have shown that certain lots of are associated with very severe side effects and death, while others have few or no adverse events. These bad batches have become known as “hot lots”. In 2021, The Éxposé showed that 100% of the deaths are being caused by 5% of the batches.
Former Pfizer executive Mike Yeadon’s team found the same; a small number of batches are highly toxic and result in hospitalization, disability and death days or weeks post-jab. All their information is published at HowBadIsMyBatch.com and HowBad.Info.
Their analysis goes further showing that the three companies — Moderna, Pfizer and Jannsen — appear to be coordinating batch release: “While one company is deploying a lethal batch, the other two deploy harmless ones.” This makes the scientific results across batches seem normal. The team’s analysis shows that the lethal batches are deployed, and followed by a “quiet” period. This allows Big Pharma to reestablish a baseline before deploying the next hot lot. More leaked documents show the CDC tracking expiration dates only for certain jab lots, and those correlate with the toxic lots Yeadon’s team found.
If You Can’t Beat Them….
To make matters worse, the hot lots are being released in a coordinated fashion – here in the US and likely in other countries as well. This suggests that vaccine makers may be choosing the winners and losers. What are their criteria?
If you’re in a red state, and you’re jabbed, you’re in trouble! Initial evidence of this was published months ago but of course ignored. The government seemingly has been directing deadly batches into specific areas. The overwhelming jab deaths are occurring in red states; analysis of the numbers of vaccinated per 100,000 is stunning across the 50 states. The top 8 states are Kentucky, Arkansas, West Virginia, Montana, Alaska, North Dakota, Wyoming and Tennessee. They are all RED states. In fact, 19 of the top 24 are red. What state is least affected? California, of course. Kentucky had a 1,900% higher jab death rate than California. This data suggests that Kentucky received 20X the deadly batches.
All 50 states, but especially those that are red, conservative and Trump-supporting, are under attack. And the villains are your own government!
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for The Tenpenny Report. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.