Although President Trump gave notice in July 2020 that the US was going to leave the World Health Organization, Biden immediately rejoined after the January 2021 inauguration. With the flick of a pen, America once again became the largest funder of the agency’s $2.4 billion budget. The US provides about $420 million, or 20 percent, of the WHO budget.
Newly infused with cash, the WHO set about draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The WHO was bolstered by the COVID pandemic “public health emergency.” It worked so well. Most countries went along with masks, lockdowns and untested emergency use authorization (EUA) vaccines. Now the WHO is feverishly working toward the approval of these amendments. The prize? Ultimate power and total control of the entire (depopulated) world, all under the guise of health.
Notice how the COVID pandemic was still going strong, and all WHO could talk about was the next pandemic – and the next one, and the next one, and the next one. After all, they can’t have a pandemic treaty without a pandemic, now can they?
What does it mean?
The amendments, now called the Pandemic Agreement, would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.
Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.
Who is leading the charge?
In 2017, an Ethiopian named Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus heavily campaigned to succeed Margaret Chan as head of the WHO. Africa had never led the organization, and it was “their turn.” Ghebreyesus is highly controversial. He served as Minister of Health in Ethiopia from 2006 to 2011, and is accused of concealing three cholera epidemics during his tenure. This deprived his country of international aid.
Ghebreyesus is called a “doctor”, but he isn’t one. He has led the WHO for six years, and during that time he seems to have learned not to conceal epidemics but to declare them. While the WHO has established no standards for declaring a pandemic, Ghebreyesus has declared three during his tenure. He has definitely learned that he gets much more power during a pandemic, and now he is marching toward ultimate authority.
Is anyone helping him? Yes, the Biden Administration is. According to an article in State of the Nation, “On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.” The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” By eliminating that and other key clauses, all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.”
Dr. Tenpenny recently had an eye-opening interview with Dr. Meryl Nass regarding this topic. By the way, both ladies ARE actually doctors. Nass has been one of very few medical professionals sounding the alarm about the global pandemic treaty since well before 2022. (For a synopsis on the events leading up to 2022, read Dr. Tenpenny’s article here.)
Click on the image to see the interview with Dr. Nass.
Nass says that the WHO has been working secretly since 2022. No one has seen any new amendments, despite the fact that the vote on the final is supposed to occur next month in May 2024. However, the latest 2022 draft gives a chilling peek into what they intend. The WHO wants a pathogen library and wants to freely send pathogens to universities around the world for “study.” They want genetic sequencing labs in every country. Why? They also want to force countries to develop permanent EUA processes to roll out any drug or vaccine or God knows what else at any time. Goodbye testing, and goodbye informed consent. Accompanying that, WHO is forcing countries to pass laws to then ensure that the EUA drug manufacturers have no liability.
One thing is for sure. The public is not being honestly informed about this treaty. The changes make no sense medically, and are very restrictive, designed to control, rather than care for, populations. A team of unelected, nameless, faceless people thousands of miles away decide what constitutes a health emergency (like one case of bird flu or a few cases of Marburg) and how America will respond. A medical police state would be set up in our country and would use surveillance to make sure we do as we’re told. Any dissenting voices would be quickly squelched from social media, because the treaty would provide that power, too.
It will supersede our US Constitution, so there’s not much we’ll be able to do about it when we disagree. Your primary physician will have to comply with their orders as well. It will be more of the same we’ve already seen with COVID. You won’t get early treatment with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, and everyone in the world will be perpetually jabbed or vaccinated with dangerous substances whether you need it or not. Natural immunity will continue to be ignored because we’ll be following the WHO directives and not the actual science.
Nass also explains that the WHO has some very unique provisions. Unlike all other UN agencies, WHO has its own constitution, meaning it can make treaties with other nations. If the treaty passes, there will be no higher health authority. The WHO constitution further states that they are not under jurisdiction of any court. This translates to an incredible built-in ability to avoid accountability. Putting it under the guise of health makes it a perfect globalist organization. But they’re not about health, now are they?
Nass says the wording of the amendments is intentionally complicated. She herself, an expert in the topic, took several months to digest it and even had to hire lawyers to decipher much of the legalese. A final document will likely be just as complicated and introduced at the 11th hour, right before the vote in May.
It’s funny how “journalists” barely out of school are coming out of the woodwork to discredit Nass, like in this idiotic Politifact piece. This stellar writer refers to Nass as “a woman who claimed the WHO’s plans would strip people of certain rights.” Politifact tried to discredit Nass, who said, “We’re undergoing a soft coup. The idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda.”
The journalist prides herself on finding out that Meta blocked posts highlighting Nass’ testimony to the European Parliament, while at the same time highlighting Politifact’s partnership with Meta. Really? How blatant can you be?
Who do you believe? A liberal youngling from Missouri who has no medical background writing for Politifact and making a statement like this: “We found no evidence to suggest that this pandemic-focused accord would remove human rights protections, mandate surveillance or infringe on people’s freedom of speech.” (Right, because no one has seen any draft since 2022, you dimwit!)
Or do you believe Dr. Meryl Nass? I know who I pick.
What can you do?
As we approach the next few weeks, a significant decision looms at the World Health Organization (WHO), but very few know about it. We must stop the WHO. First, educate yourself by clicking on the links in this article, or by visiting Dr. Nass’ website Door to Freedom, which has extensive information on this treaty. Also, watch this eye-opening commentary by NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe Fisher, who sheds further light on the implications of WHO’s proposed IHR amendments.
Click here to see Dr. Tenpenny’s interview with NVIC chair Barbara Loe Fisher.
Next, take action. Both sites have action steps you can take to protect your freedoms and U.S. sovereignty. Healthcare is not a federal issue; Nass says states can pass laws to boot WHO out of their business. Louisiana did that recently; read that here. Nass also states that this can be done at the county level, and that she knows of several counties in Florida doing just that.
Let’s unite in defending fundamental rights and shaping a future where individual autonomy reigns. It’s time to stop the WHO.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Get more of Dr. Tenpenny’s voice of reason at her website.
Join our list here
Make a donation here (and thank you!)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for The Tenpenny Report. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.