by James Grundvig, Vaxxter contributor, Investigative Reporter
The maker of the N95 respirator mask designed it for the mining and construction industry. It filters out 95 percent of the visible airborne dust particles, keeping them from entering the lungs. It has vents so the wearers can exhale. Demolition crews use them, concrete laborers use them, so do workers who sand wood floors, gypsum board walls, and plaster ceilings. Workers in other trades, such as electrical, plumbing, rough carpentry, and wood finishers rarely wear masks. Why? They inhibit the flow of oxygen into the lungs while stifling the expulsion of waste in the form of carbon dioxide. Workers don’t wear them because masks impede their work.
For too long now, health officials sold us that donning masks and other face coverings, such as bandanas, would somehow slow the spread of the nano-sized virus, SARS-CoV2, which causes the symptom complex referred to as COVID-19. Their theory doesn’t hold water. It has no precedent in medicine or science. Speaking with several veteran nurses about facemasks, they stated they never wore them when treating infected patients, whether they had tuberculosis or were suffering with AIDS during the 1980s epidemic. Hospital patients never wore them either. Why? They don’t protect.
Dust particles are far more significant than nano-sized viruses
How big – or small – is a nanometer? On the nano-scale, a nanometer is a billionth of a meter. It’s invisible to the human eye. Put in perspective, a single sheet of paper is 100,000 nanometers thick. A strand of human DNA, identified under a microscope in the 1950s by Francis Crick and James Watson, is 2.5 nanometers in diameter.
It’s not small. It’s super tiny.
Still, five months into the COVID-19 virus outbreak, many states are pushing for more stringent mask orders, including wearing them outside in the summer heat and humidity. That “mandate” came, even though cases for COVID-19, influenza, and pneumonia have declined over ten straight weeks. Today, the tracking numbers will soon fall below the CDC epidemic threshold of 5.9%. When it does, their emergency will be over.
Because governors have been ignoring the reality of falling epidemic numbers, Kentucky’s Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles (R) and The Evans Orchard and Cider Mills, LLC, filed a lawsuit against Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D) handcuffing his new emergency order to wear masks on the same day it was issued.
The circuit court judge challenged Gov. Beshear, telling that in order for him to issue and enforce an executive order related to Covid-19, he must, “specifically state the emergency that requires the order, the location of the emergency, and the name of the local emergency management agency that has determined that the emergency is beyond its capabilities.”
Since the court case, Kentucky had 272 new COVID-19 cases, with the governor threatening citizens to “wear masks to avoid reopening reversal.”
The Hidden Agenda of Telehealth
The temporary restraining order also uncovered yet another hidden agenda by the Democrat governor. “Surprisingly, lawyers for the governor admitted in court this week that the administration used the emergency regulatory process to expand telehealth during the pandemic, but they didn’t do that when they closed or began to reopen the economy,” said Quarles. This goes beyond telemedicine. They are beta testing face recognition apps in order to surveil people with and without masks. This hidden agenda is for the benefit of artificial intelligence.
Many other governors, including New York’s Andrew Cuomo (D) and New Jersey’s Phil Murphy (D), are not basing their decisions on science. What are their hidden agendas? What ulterior motives do they have for not reopening society long after the pandemic has peaked and waned? On July 6, Cuomo continued the “temporary suspension and modification laws” for New York’s emergency disaster declaration. Murphy, who had dinner with rocker John Bon Jovi on July 1 at a New Jersey restaurant while not wearing masks or following social distancing, established new rules for wearing masks outdoors a few days later.
Why are they doing this in the summer with the illnesses from this infection fading in the rearview mirror? Why are they doing this when there’s a lot of UV virus-killing light and heat and humidity that shortens the “half-life“ of coronavirus in droplets to less than one hour?
None of this makes sense unless the “rulers” are working from the Big Pharma playbook.
New York State hired the consulting firms Deloitte and McKinsey to create an “anti-Trump,” science-proof COVID-19 plan. One wonders if McKinsey was the consultant that advised Governor Cuomo to commit sanctioned manslaughter by sending 6,300 coronavirus-infected senior citizens into nursing homes across the state that juiced the state’s death totals.
In 2019, McKinsey paid a $15 million fine over “disclosure failures” during bankruptcy proceedings, hiding conflicts of interest. The year before, a competitor accused the consulting giant of racketeering. And yet, in the thick of the COVID-19 crisis, McKinsey is expanding its pharmaceutical businesses by conducting mask surveys and keeping an eye on the quarter-trillion dollar telehealth market waiting to be mined.
What else are the American people not being told about the hidden agendas of the states, the mainstream media, the pharmaceutical industry and Big Tech? What are their real plans for us? It goes beyond vaccines.
So, how does wearing masks and maintaining six feet of social distance further their hidden agendas?
Surveillance, AI, and Mask Wearing
For the past three years, Communist China has carried out a social-biological experiment that emerged in the world’s most surveilled state, Xinjiang province. Beyond the more than one million Uyghur people placed in “re-education” camps, its citizens are spied on, monitored, and followed. Everything they do, from going to work and passing checkpoints to grocery shopping and all social activities, their every move is tracked and logged. The New York Times rightly observed that mass surveillance “subdues the minorities,” breaking their human spirit and free will. The Chinese citizens are also exposed to EMF frequencies that inhibit the “fight or flight” chemical reaction in humans’ brains, making them docile.
Coming to America?
Is this what the Vaccine Deep State is planning here in the United States? Let’s examine the list of COVID-19 rules, listing them as “what-if” scenarios to see what might exist behind the curtain.
- What-if the COVID-19 swab tests are a hidden agenda to harvest people’s DNA?
- What-if contact tracing is designed to track your every move and link your activities to all of your family and friends?
- What-if wearing masks is really to beta-test face-recognition software, to see if the software can identify people with partially covered faces?
- What-if social distancing aides the face-recognition beta test?
What could the planners do with our DNA? People could be grouped together by damaged genes, called abnormal snips. Pharma could tailor-make vaccines and drugs and then implant those products into a person’s body using RFID nano-chips. EMF frequencies could then be used to tune into a subset of people and subdue them.
On face detection software, here is how the program works. It’s a two-step process in which the surveillance system locates the “region of interest” on a person (the face), and then identifies facial landmarks. In 2017, the U.S. National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) created datasets and challenges for face recognition vendors to improve their software. NIST created standards via simulations and data parameters that enabled vendors to test, reiterate, and improve their programs.
A Slovakia software firm, Innovatrics, has already demonstrated its technology in a brief video of people wearing masks during COVID-19. They tested it on their own employees in the building, who gain access to the biometric scans of the face. That was before COVID. They then tested it with the same employees wearing masks, enabling their machine-learning technology to identify masked people accurately. NIST rated Innovatrics as a top performer across all categories in its Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT). So, the technology is already here, and it works.
Dr. Judy Mikovits on Masks
In reaching out to former NIH virologist, Dr. Judy Mikovits, she said, “The unprecedented widespread use of masks is ineffective and harmful. If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person who is ill with COVID-19,” according to the WHO guidelines.
“Masks weaken the body making the virus’ job easier. They also reduce the intake of oxygen and trap the exhaling of carbon dioxide at the mouth and nose so that the body’s ability to fight off infection can be diminished.”
Dr. Mikovits quoted Dr. Jim Meehan, MD:
“Medical masks [cloth] are single-use devices designed to be worn for a relatively short period. Once the mask becomes saturated with moisture from breath, which, if properly fit, takes about an hour, it should be replaced. The more moisture-saturated the mask becomes, the more it blocks oxygen, increases re-breathing of carbon dioxide, re-breathing of viral particles, and becomes a breeding ground for other pathogens.”
Mikovits also noted that Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020, that
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. While masks may block some droplets, they do not provide the level of protection people think they do. Wearing a mask may also have unintended consequences: People who wear masks tend to touch their faces more often to adjust them, which can spread germs from their hands.”
Fauci flipped on not wearing masks, to now wearing them in July.
Judy Mikovits, the author of the New York Times bestselling book Plague of Corruption, shrugged when she thought about Dr. Fauci and his inner circle of public health officials. “They love to toss about—false—allegations of actual experimental evidence being only anecdotal, or not, alternately, to advance their agenda.”
“I cannot recall any time in human history when nearly universal use of masks throughout society has successfully controlled the spread of disease,” Dr. Mikovits said. “The data support the opposite. That is, masks suppress the immune system, render the mist vulnerable to infection, and amplify more viruses in the compromised who become victims and further spread the disease among family and close contacts.
Without transparency on emergency rules, actual case infection numbers, and auditable certified COVID-deaths, the abuses by elected officials on mask-wearing, social distancing, and other forms of public control will continue until more lawsuits are filed. They will challenge the unconstitutional orders and government overreach.
As if on cue with the other states, on Friday, July 10, Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) signed an order requiring people in her state to wear masks “in all indoor places.”
Have we been played? Yes. I also believe we are part of a global biological experiment that is unprecedented in human history.
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.
Photocredit: ID 178479984 © Dremal | Dreamstime.com